An invective, the one made by the secretary in the red robes, which reproaches to Matteo Salvini and others Luigi Di Maio to lead the country “towards a new highly regressive regulatory and cultural structure for rights and guarantees and towards a tampering with the principles of the rule of law which deprives the jurisdiction of its role of guarantee and third party”.
Guglielmini's report is full of ideological positions and summarizes the discontent that has arisen in recent months judges progressives has repeatedly expressed attacking the leaders of the Conte government. From policies to combat illegal immigration to measures to support life, Democratic judiciary impales the main measures approved by the current executive. “In just a few months the face of our country has changed – This is the alarm raised by Guglielmini – and the path that has led our democracy to this point seems to have been interrupted”. After the elections of 4 March 2018, according to the red robes, in Italy they would have imposed themselves “two symmetrical radicalisms”: the sovereignist one, embodied by League, That “he intercepted resentment and offered him a target and an enemy, represented by the foreigner”, and that of “egalitarian and chameleonic radicalism of anti-politics”, carried out by the Five Star Movement, that they have “supported the rebelliousness and moods of the moment”. More than a relationship, In short, it is an indictment. A real harangue. That, but, at the bottom he admits (Perhaps, with a hint of bitterness) “the defeat of the left” which he lost today “his people”.

Even without ever mentioning it, the main defendant of the democratic judiciary is Salvini. “With its inexhaustible transformism – they accuse him – can compromise even on the skin of the migrants abandoned to their fate at sea”. The words used against the Northern League leader are very violent. “With the closure of our ports and the banning of Ong an unprecedented violation of the legal and moral obligations of rescue and reception took place, which derive from domestic and international law”. Then, recalling the cases of the Aquarius ship and the Diciotti, Guglielmini even talks about “a moral inversion” That, “in a few months and with a few gestures”, ha “annihilated entire experiences of integration and inclusion”. “We have thus destroyed entire communities that grew up around the value of hospitality and the opportunities that peaceful coexistence offers to the entire community – the red robes continue – we have deprived 'people’ of rights, not because of what they do but because the country where they were born and from which they were forced to flee is different from ours”.
In the crosshairs of the current left of the judiciary does not end only with the rules on immigration and security. Obviously, not even the reform of the legitimate defense, which should become law in the coming weeks. In this case, Salvini and his men are accused of subversion “the value system of our Constitution”. And again: the Pillon bill on foster care is defined “obscurantist” and compared to that “sub-culture, highly ideological, which produced initiatives against abortion and attacks in the name of traditional family values’ to civil unions, to the biotestament, to the secularity of the state”. To Luigi Di Maio, Instead, Md reproaches the citizen's income. Sweet at the bottom, the probosites to reform the judicial system they are seen as actions “subversive” to be stopped as soon as possible, thus preserving the excessive power of the togas. “There is a targeted attack on individual magistrates to discredit their work and offer them to the public pillory of social media – is Guglielmi's conclusion – with continuous attempts to delegitimize judicial intervention”.