Of Enrica Perucchietti
Source: Revolution
A few days before the start of the event, "red" censorship was triggered at the Turin Book Fair: some journalists and the publisher Francesco Giubilei they were branded as “neo-fascists and racistsyes Christian Raimo That, being a member of the Salon's editorial committee, plays an institutional role…(see the article by Francesco Giubilei).
They ended up in the sights of the thought police respectively:Alessandro Giuli(journalist, television writer and co-host of Povera Patria, he confirmed to me that he hadn't even been invited, so he didn't have any events scheduled),Francesco Borgonovo(former editor-in-chief of the newspaper «Libero» and author of La Gabbia on La7, he is now editor-in-chief for «La Verità», essayist and host of Iceberg on Telelombardia) eAdriano Scianca(director of «Il Primato Nazionale», collaborator of «La Verità» and national culture manager for CasaPound Italia).Evidently they would like to be prevented from attending the Fair and from expressing themselves freely.
In the current society ofpolitically correct, in which everything is spectacularized and trivialized, those who do not align with the single thought are denigrated, persecuted and branded with the stigma of "fascism".
The paradox is that violence, censorship and the squad attitude comes precisely from those who cloak themselves in do-gooder slogans and stuff their mouths with politically correct mantras. Political correctness has become a real ideology that rewrites the language, it indicates a morality to be followed and reprograms the minds and behaviors of the masses.

The totalitarianism of good feelings (“good” only in appearance) has its watchdogs ready to bring back into the fold anyone who dissents or dares to publicly express doubts or ideas that oppose the mainstream narrative.
The aim is to neutralize critical conscience and censor any form of dissidence.
For those who go astray, the first sanction is a warning on the web via armies of haters and cyberbullyers. We then move on to exclusion from the debate (otherwise the accused could explain his motives and ensnare other weak minds), finally to punishment.
Anyone who dissents must be censored, he must become ashamed not only of what he said but of what he "dared" to think. He will therefore be able to be accepted back into the community only if he humbles himself and publicly asks for forgiveness.
By denigrating and persecuting intellectuals and critical minds, we hope to discourage them from continuing their research. If they persist in continuing, they will be punished through the ever-increasing number of regulations and through the introduction of the crime of opinion (the battle over fake news also serves this purpose).
Some issues must not be talked about so as not to offend some minorities who seem to have taken critical sense hostage.
We should ask ourselves: we are still in a democracy?
One can rightly not share certain ideas, oppose and criticize them, but censorship and the thought police climate are alarming signs of a climate of hatred that is becoming increasingly tangible and even brazen.