[ 10 April 2019 ]
The philosopher Augusto Del Noce said of himself “I am neither reactionary, nor conservative, but traditionalist”.
By accepting this taxonomy how to classify Maurizio Blondet? Perhaps he is a mixture of the three categories.
But this is not what I want to talk about but rather to point out a very recent article of his, Draghi government, off to the last looting.
He takes inspiration from the rumors according to which Mattarella is preparing to award Mario Draghi the title of senator and then nominate him, given that Draghi will leave the ECB in the autumn, a Prime Minister of a Monti-bis government.
E’ It is plausible that the Eurocratic elite has this operation in mind? Yes it is. We also agree with Blondet that it must not only be denounced but rejected by all means. So where is the problem?? Whatever it is, taking inspiration from some very recent statements
made by Di Maio on Fazio's broadcast (aimed at calming the oligarchy and presenting the M5s as a reliable pro-European political force), after having said all sorts of things against the Movement 5 stables, Don't let the blonde down, textual:
«With extreme rapidity, almost like an agreed signal, all the actors are repositioning themselves for the new framework that will bring Mario Draghi to government with the support of 5 Stables, as well as the PD, Berlusconi escorts, and perhaps even of the League".
Simply put, Blondet, not only does it take for granted that we will have a Draghi government without going through early elections, but that this government will be supported, as well as from the Pd and Berluscones, from the Five Stars… and perhaps even by the League.
Next door, as an example, what is claimed by the far right. Di Stefano also takes it for granted that this government “it's finished”, that therefore i “populists” they are dead. From which it can be deduced that the prairie is open and that the people are only waiting for a new savior of the country to be at their head, alias, By Stefano himself
With all due respect, we disagree. And we disagree not because we exclude that the Eurocratic elite will do everything to get rid of the yellow-green government and regain the position of Palazzo Chigi - in fact we are sure of it, complete with the unleashing of a financial storm already in the summer to throw the country into panic and put the government with its back to the wall, more or less as was done in the summer 2011 with the Berlusconi government.
What we would like to exclude is that such a government could arise without going through early elections, or in the form of a change of parliamentary majority. And why do we exclude it? We exclude it because we do not share Blondet's opinion on the Movement 5 place, who according to him will pass bag and baggage to the side of the Euro-coup plotters. That in the climate of possible financial terrorism a part of the M5s parliamentarians could go over to the enemy, it is certainly possible. But this is a different matter from claiming that the M5s as a whole will end up more miserable than that of Tsipras. What is involved here is the analysis of “populism”, of its nature, of the social forces it interprets, therefore of a management group which for Blondet is gatekeeper, therefore with his own suicide already planned. A vision, that of Blondet, simplistic and conspiracy-minded.
It should be noted that ours specifies that he will give support to the eventual Draghi government “Perhaps” also the League. Il “Perhaps” it is significant because it reveals on which side Blondet's sympathies lie. Also with regards to the League, It is no secret that its Northern component is sensitive and interprets the interests of the powerful Po Valley bourgeoisie, who cares about “sovereignism” and is aiming for a business agreement with the German one. It is not excluded that this fraction could lend itself to the Draghi operation. But from here to be sure that Salvini agrees to make himself look like a clown, rather than the principal gatekeeper, this does not correspond.
That under the tremendous pressure of the attack of the “markets” the populist camp, in both of its performances, may suffer disarticulation and even flaking, this is probable. That's the phenomenon “populist” proves to be a soap bubble, a parenthesis, that the phase that opened with 4 March 2018 can therefore… end up in the cavalry, this is to be excluded. If the attack to overthrow the yellow-green government comes, how is this possible, we will not have a calm parliamentary turnover but, on the contrary, an exacerbation of the conflict between the populist and euro-oligarchic camps. A conflict that could overflow, get out of the buildings to involve society.
From this perspective, everything must be done, less than fueling skepticism and catastrophism, taking it for granted that the eurocracy will once again succeed in its plans. It's not about being optimistic, it's about seeing, together with the weak points of the populist camp, even those of the elite, who have never been in difficulty like now. In short, the game is open and after the first round of the budget law 2019, the next one, the second, will be the decisive one.
It is therefore necessary, not only ensure that this government resists the enemy attack, everyone needs to, instead of taking the surrender for granted, from his position, prepare for battle.