Of Rosanna Spadini

Source: Comedonchisciotte
Scrive Eric Zuesse, are strategic-culture.org, that two political camps, one led by George Soros, and the other created by newcomer Steve Bannon, they entered into competition for political control of Europe. Soros led the big capitalists for a long time liberals Americans for control of Europe, and Bannon is now organizing a team of conservative billionaires to snatch victory from the liberals. So the two factions of 'philanthropists' will now fight for control of the political consensus and European institutions. However, they will struggle to keep Europe as an ally in the war against Russia, but each team will do so from different ideological perspectives. Just as there is a liberal-conservative political polarization between capitalists within a nation, there is also another polarization among capitalists regarding their nation's foreign policies. None of them are progressives or left-wing populists. The only 'populism' that any capitalist currently promotes is that of Bannon's team. Anyway both teams demonize each other for control of the US Government, and internationally for control of the entire world, opposing two different visions of the world: liberal and conservative, or rather globalist and nationalist. Both then say they support 'democracy, but instead promote the spread of "democracy" through the invasion and occupation of "enemy" countries. […]
The sovereignty of a nation belongs to the people who live there, according to "the right to self-determination of peoples" enunciated by President Woodrow Wilson on the occasion of the Treaty of Versailles (1919). Consequentially, while an authentic revolution of residents within a country, to overthrow and replace their government, or a vote for secession, they can be legitimized and recognized by the principle of national sovereignty, no foreign invasion is (and this also includes any 'color revolution'). This means that the concept of national sovereignty is fundamentally alien to culture liberal. […] The United States is now a full-fledged empire, they control not only the financial capitalist aristocracies in some banana republics such as Guatemala and Honduras, but also those of richer countries such as France, Germany and the United Kingdom.
This view was widely promoted among 1877-1902 by the founder of the Rhodes Trust, Cecil Rhodes, a self-declared racist who passionately argued how all “races” were subordinate to the “first race”: the English. In more recent times, George Soros shared this vision, justifying foreign aggression in a country by the “international community” to protect “the popular sovereignty” of that country. Which is from the textbook of democratic logic. On the contrary, Vladimir Putin states that no foreigner has the right to invade another country, against Soros, which states that “the international community” instead has the “obligation to invade”, whenever and wherever you decide to do it. In practice, Soros' proposal amounts to polarizing and making the UN irrelevant, to strengthen international imperialism. Two totally different worldviews, why the West calls Russia's "seize" and "invasion" of Crimea in 2014, denying the fact that the inhabitants of Crimea may have the right to decide. Vladimir Putin's point of view has been expressed many times, in so many different contexts, and it always seems to be the same, that is, that the only people who have a sovereign right to any place on earth, they are the people who live on that land. In other words, his basic vision seems to be a rejection of the very concept of empire. Although the big capitalists succeeded, during the first Cold War, to deceive the public about theirs plan to completely eliminate communism, George Herbert Walker Bush had made it clear, on the night of 24 February 1990, to the leaders of the foreign allies of the US capital aristocracy, That the real objective was the conquest of the world, and until then the Cold War would continue in great secrecy, perhaps no longer according to an anti-communist claim, but above all in an anti-Russian key. And that's what happens today, not just in the Democratic Party, and not just in the Republican Party, and not just in the USA, but in all their alliance. All American propaganda always presents the USA as the “aggrieved party” against “the aggressors” (Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran, Yemen, China), all allies (or even just friends) of Russia are the "plague victims", “aggressors” or they are “dictatorships” or in any case “threats to America”, considered the only true “Great Democracy”. In truth it is an empire of considerable proportions, historically unprecedented, because it dominates all continents. All you have to do is support him and you are well received in the mainstream media. This is American “democracy.”. Naturally, critical articles do not qualify as true "journalism" in the USA, they are instead discredited as “blogging”.
After World War II, the US imperialist power took economic control of Western Europe with the Marshall Plan and, subsequently, after the economic collapse of the Soviet Union, the aims of conquest were directed towards the whole of Europe. They did this not only by expanding NATO after the 1990 (the Warsaw Pact had disappeared), but also through the European Union, created in the 1950s with an anti-Russian and anti-communist perspective. Their real goal was conquest, before Russia's allies, and then, ultimately, of Russia itself, to thus complete the global conquest. Mikhail Gorbachev's concession to the unification of Germany and the end of the Cold War, was negotiated with the promise that NATO would not expand “one inch eastward”. It meant that America would not try to place its nuclear missiles right across Russia's borders, close enough to Moscow to launch a nuclear flash attack. Secretary of State James Baker had made this promise to Gorbachev, which would end the Cold War afterwards 46 years. Russia therefore kept its side of the bargain: demolished the Berlin Wall, allowed the unification of Germany. Ma, contrary to the promise made, the United States and its allies did not end their war against a now free Russia. Instead, over the years, the NATO alliance absorbed, one by one, former member nations of the Warsaw Pact, and yet he rejected the opening to Russia. NATO expanded eastward, to the borders of Russia, exactly the opposite of what he promised. Russia's continued desire to join NATO was simply rejected, then in the following decades, NATO has absorbed practically all of the former Warsaw Pact, but also in the Middle East, sometimes with the complicity of their European and/or Sunni fundamentalist allies, it directly invaded other countries, come in Iraq 2003, it bombed other nations, like in Libya 2011, and in Syria 2011, up to the current threat from the Shiite nation allied with Russia, Iran. So while the Cold War ended on Russia's side, instead he secretly continued (and continues) on the part of America, indeed the American war against Russia has recently intensified, and only the advent of Trump and the Helsinki summit seems to have marked a change of pace.
The public announcement of this new war by the great American capitalists for the control of Europe appeared on 20 July 2018 on the US neocon website, ovvero pro-imperialismo The Daily Beast (pro-Serial, anti-Bannon). SoSteve Bannon plans to counter George Soros and spark a right-wing revolution in Europe. In fact, Trump's former chief White House advisor stated that is creating a foundation in Europe called “The Movement”, that he can lead a right-wing populist uprising across the continent starting with the European Parliament elections next spring. The non-profit will be a central source of surveys, messaging tips, targeting of data and research think-tank for a right-wing malaise that is spreading throughout Europe, in many cases without professional political structures or significant budgets. Bannon's ambition is for his organization to eventually rival the impact gained by Soros' Open Society, that he employed $ 32 billions for liberalist causes since it was founded in 1984. During the past year, Bannon had held talks with right-wing groups across the continent from Nigel Farage and members of Marine Le Pen's Front National (recently renamed Rassemblement National) in the West, to the Hungarian Viktor Orban and the Polish populists in the East. Bannon imagines he could activate a right-wing “supergroup” within the European Parliament that could attract up to a third of lawmakers after the European elections next May. A united populist bloc of that size would have the capacity to seriously disrupt parliamentary proceedings, potentially granting Bannon enormous power within the populist movement. After being forced to leave the White House following internal disputes, which would later emerge in Michael Wolff's book “In Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House“, Bannon is now relishing the opportunity to plot his new European empire… “I would rather reign in hell, rather than serve in heaven", he said, paraphrasing the Satan of John Milton's "Paradise Lost".. […] The headquarters of the Movement should be in Brussels, where they will begin hiring staff in the coming months. It is expected that there will be fewer than 10 full-time employees before the election of 2019, with a polling expert, a communications officer, an office manager and a researcher among the positions. The plan is to raise them to more than 25 people after the 2019 if the project will be a success. Bannon plans to spend the 50% of his time in Europe, especially in the field rather than in the Brussels office, once the US midterm elections are over in November. The operation is also expected to act as a link between right-wing movements in Europe and the Trump Freedom Caucus in the United States. […] All the great republican capitalists (Jews, evangelical Christians and others) they have been strong supporters of Israel, which in turn is naturally allied with the Sauds; and both Israel and the Sauds are particularly convinced of the need for war against Iran, rather than against Russia (main objective of the American aristocracy). Only American capitalists are obsessed with conquering Russia. They have been this way since World War II. In fact, today's Axis is made up of the Nazi/fascist heirs of Hitler's failed Operation Barbarossa to conquer the Soviet Union. After World War II, the American CIA, along with Britain's MI6 and other government agencies, as well as the Vatican, they produced “rat lines” to settle in the United States, in Argentina and Canada, and these “ex” Nazis were welcomed by the CIA, for the future conquest of the Soviet Union. […] right from the start, the EU was a means to impose control over Europeans corporations US international organizations to the benefit of American businesses. That was the main purpose of the EU, subordination to American capitalism, no authentic democracy. The vassalage within the American empire had to be functional to their project: conquer Europe first and then the world.
Evans-Pritchard exhorted his readers: “In my opinion, the Brexit camp should be laying out plans to increase defense spending, pledging to push Britain into the lead, as the undisputed military power of Europe.” His imperialist vision is an extension of that of Cecil Rhodes at the end of 1800, which aspired to a global empire between the United Kingdom and the United States, in which the two imperial powers, the old and the new, they would gradually take control of the entire world. George Soros has been working feverishly toward that goal, while Steve Bannon prefers the "nationalist" project, but both versions are liberal and conservative. […] But what all neocons have always passionately shared was a visceral hatred towards the Russians. […]